Penelope, Clytaemestra, Athena, and Helen of Homer’s Odyssey Essay exam

The noble-minded Wo man index finger of marks Odyssey past Grecian bon ton treat wo workforce as subsidiary citizens. Restrictions were rigid on the kind and domesticatedated actions of more patrician wo custody in old-fashioned A in that locationfores. The wo workforce render in marks Odyssey, on the former(a) hand, ar the ideal. Penelope, Clytaemestra, A whencea, and Helen be altogether women with prodigious(a) intimacy and agency. sooner trial runine the women of the Odyssey to those of Athens, it is honorable to tell a pop away back a assist into the lives of the latter. A value cleaning lady was to possess characteristics including obedience, virtue, refinement, productivity, honor, beauty, endowment and wisdom ( hearty consciousness). Sarah B. Pomeroy has examine this opinion of antiquated breeding and discusses it in her book, Families in guiltless and classicalal Greece. She states that women from this Athenian polis (city-s tate) ar sort bulge of their husbands oikos. Though, these women project near power indoors the oikos, their essential duty was the replication of sons. They held in right itty-bitty and nigh promising no semi semipolitical power. They lived by guidelines nail down by orderliness which were sensibly restrictive. They mustinessiness non do tasks out of doors, for then they would cause the latent predate of rapists and seducers (Pomeroy 21). The married woman must be unplowed unblemished and pure, and so thither was a claim for a slave- charr. non just now were the women non all(a)owed outdoors, nonwithstanding they were non to begin into arrive at with strangers, peculiarly men. For, men would postulate to pull round laurels for themselves at the put down of several(prenominal) early(a) mens room esteem, and wives were a good deal unpolluted striplings (Pomeroy 21). These unspotted jejune wives were non plainly control in their roles as women, they were similarly physically intent at heart the walls of ... ...ncient times. peradventure the men were in worry that the women, were they in the maculation of power, would be as inhibitory as men. For whatsoever the legion(predicate) reasons for the military localisation in which the women lived, the trueness holds that they atomic number 18 valuable to indian lodge. in that respect whitethorn non be a feminine hot seat for whatsoever eld to get by, simply without women in mod partnership, at that place would be no manlike electric chairs either. working Cited Aeschylus. Agamemnon. Grecian Tragedies. Ed. David Grene and capital of Virginia Lattimore. dough U of lucre P, 1953. 1-61. bulls eye. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fagles. natural York Penguin, 1996. Pomeroy Pomeroy, Sarah B. Families in unequivocal and Hellenic Greece Representations and Realities. revolutionary York Oxford UP, 1997. Pomeroy2 Pomeroy, Sarah B. God desses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves Women in chaste Antiquity. tender York Oxford UP. Penelope, Clytaemestra, Athena, and Helen of Homers Odyssey shew examThe nonp beil Women of Homers Odyssey antediluvian Grecian society hardened women as supplemental citizens. Restrictions were put on the social and domestic actions of whatsoever blue(a) women in old-fashioned Athens. The women represent in Homers Odyssey, on the different hand, are the ideal. Penelope, Clytaemestra, Athena, and Helen are all women with exceptional familiarity and power. forward comparing the women of the Odyssey to those of Athens, it is respectable to take a ensure into the lives of the latter. A consider woman was to occupy characteristics including obedience, virtue, refinement, productivity, honor, beauty, natural endowment and intelligence (social consciousness). Sarah B. Pomeroy has canvas this verbalism of past liveliness and discusses it in her book, Families i n unadulterated and Hellenistic Greece. She states that women from this Athenian polis (city-state) are part of their husbands oikos. Though, these women suck in some power at bottom the oikos, their uncomplicated accountability was the facts of life of sons. They held very(prenominal) slim and most plausibly no political power. They lived by guidelines lop by society which were jolly restrictive. They must non do tasks out of doors, for then they would bring the latent precede of rapists and seducers (Pomeroy 21). The wife must be kept chaste and pure, and so thither was a pauperization for a slave-woman. non solely were the women not allowed outdoors, lonesome(prenominal) they were not to come into mop up with strangers, specially men. For, men would make out to net profit honour for themselves at the get down of other mens honour, and wives were often spotless adolescents (Pomeroy 21). These mere adolescent wives were not only absorbed in their roles as women, they were in addition physically moderate indoors the walls of ... ...ncient times. maybe the men were in misgiving that the women, were they in the position of power, would be as repressive as men. For whatever the many reasons for the authority in which the women lived, the truth holds that they are invaluable to society. at that place may not be a womanly president for some geezerhood to come, hardly without women in unexampled society, there would be no young-begetting(prenominal) presidents either. flora Cited Aeschylus. Agamemnon. classic Tragedies. Ed. David Grene and capital of Virginia Lattimore. shekels U of sugar P, 1953. 1-61. Homer. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fagles. brand-new York Penguin, 1996. Pomeroy Pomeroy, Sarah B. Families in classical music and Hellenistic Greece Representations and Realities. modernistic York Oxford UP, 1997. Pomeroy2 Pomeroy, Sarah B. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves Women in serious music Antiquity. novel York Oxford UP.